Another bit of evidence for the proclitic nature of prepositions is that a "word end" falling between a preposition and its object is not treated as a genuine word end by Bentley-Luchs's Law or Meyers Law. For example, Bentley-Luch's Law states that if in iambo-trochaic verse there is a word end after the final B the preceding A must be bimoraic, but Curc. 477 (tr7) shows that a sequence of a preposition plus object was permitted in this position:
confidentes, garrulique et malevoli supra lacum.
confidentes, garrulique et malevoli supra lacum.
B c D A B c D A b b c D a B c D
No comments:
Post a Comment